Random Notes and Generalizations

1. The internet is like a vector of infectious disease. Why do you think “viral” has become such an important concept? Just as in real life, the infection spreads quickly, takes a toll, and then fades away. Lately, we have Author Behaving Badly and Author Letting Her Side Down, and everybody and their cousin has to get a word in, even if that word has already been said innumerable times.

But these viruses have their uses. For one thing, they’re great for anyone interested in human behavior. The Author Behaving Badly epidemic still seems to be going strong, with one blogger mentioning today that there are now over 300 comments. I quit reading after the first hundred, noting the patterns developing, which included people trashing the Badly Behaved Author just because they could. In any “discussion” that stirs strong emotions, you can count on people jumping on the bandwagon even though they have nothing to contribute. You can also count on the comments either going completely off-track or spawning multiple off-track threads.

Are writers any less prone to bandwagon behavior and what we might call Commenters Behaving Badly than any other segment of the net population? Absolutely not.

2. The “discussion” about Author Letting Her Side Down has apparently become just as vitriolic as the Author Behaving Badly. I haven’t bothered to follow this one because the author in question isn’t someone whose work I would ever read. And no, not even out of curiosity. This is a case of success “proving” that being an indie author doesn’t consign you to the lower depths of ignominy and obscurity. Having so “proved” this point, Author Letting Her Side Down had the gall to sign up with a “real” publisher, with whom she’s going to make even more money. Rather than being seen as an instance of someone who’s thought deeply about what they want to accomplish for themselves and worked hard to achieve it, Author has been put on a pedestal by a segment of the writing community that badly needs justification for their own choices. Is it any surprise that Author’s decision to sign a contract is seen as a betrayal? “You’re one of us, so we own you, and now you’ve betrayed us” is a common mindset, so nobody should be surprised by the uproar.

It’s all just human beings behaving like human beings. Ugly, but fascinating for anyone with a sociological bent.

Advertisements

7 thoughts on “Random Notes and Generalizations

  1. The Author Behaving Badly? I don’t think so. She went off like a firecracker about a bad review, being totally illogical, even telling commenters to f-ck off. Even accused them of being part of a conspiracy. But a lot of the commenters were just about as bad.

  2. I saw an article about an indie author who had signed with a fairly large publisher. I’m not sure if it’s the one you’re talking about, and I haven’t read her work myself, but the move itself doesn’t make me feel any type of way. I feel about the same as I would if someone moved on from managing a Mom & Pop store to managing a few Wal-Marts–sure that they have their reasons and that each route has its benefits and drawbacks. People get too invested in how other people manage their writing careers and measure their success. As long as that person is happy with their decision, more power to them (and more fees and a bigger cut for the publisher).

    I’ve had my fair share of experience with bad commentors and authors, and it’s never fun. People recycle the same facts and debate the same points over and over again. I can be a little guilty of this, as I sometimes don’t read others’ comments until after I respond (so I can make sure I get out exactly what I think, you understand ;-)). I have no problem with discussions as long as people are respectful and actually put some thought into how they feel (and not which way the majority is leaning–either to join or deride).

  3. ……………………………………Talking to an agent friend the other day I heard about a situation where an author posted something inflammatory about a publishing professional on a social networking site. The comment wasnt targeted at a specific individual but at a group of people who work at the publishing house that is putting out said authors book..When confronted about the possibly damaging content of the message the author didnt see the agents point of view. Attached to this authors name..Heres a tip for online decorum if you think it might be taken the wrong way or if youre having a crabby day as you type it you probably shouldnt post it.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s