NaNoWriMo — Perspectives on the Pantser/Planner Divide

This NaNoWriMo comment is cross-posted, and slightly edited,  because I just realized it might be useful here.

~ ~ ~ ~ ~

Here’s something I’ve never seen mentioned in any discussion of pantsing vs outlining (or at least planning). From both my personal experience and reading the screams of pain that pop up on the forums after NaNo, I think the need for some kind of outline increases with the complexity (and length) of the story. It’s probably the number one reason so many NaNoers wind up with a complete mess of a book that’s a nightmare to revise.

I have two very long stories — 12,000 and 16,000 words — written with no outline and very little planning. But they only had one plot line and a linear chronology. A novella that’s up to 43,000 words was written the same way, but it’s now reached the point where I’m having to make notes about the rest.

This year’s NaNo novel has several plot threads and characters, and moves back and forth in time. There’s no way I could write it without advance planning, if only to get the scenes in order. As I develop scenes, I find that some of them need to be somewhere else than where I originally had them. Shifting them around within the outline means that I won’t forget crucial scenes, and won’t have a lot of plot holes and continuity problems to fix later.

By the way, the other thing that’s seldom mentioned is your intentions for the finished novel. If you’re not planning to publish, none of this is really a problem. I’ve been steadily working toward cleaner first drafts because that reduces the amount of time I have to spend on revisions and edits to get a book publication-ready. It’s also why I do some light editing throughout November. NaNo isn’t really about fun, for me, except on the forums. It’s a month of hard work, following several months of planning, and that’s the way I treat it. If you’re doing it for fun, or for getting your fiction feet wet, anything goes. And don’t let anyone tell you different.


2 thoughts on “NaNoWriMo — Perspectives on the Pantser/Planner Divide

  1. So you head into the storm with plenty of provisions, then? I know a lot of writers who just dive in head first and start flapping their arms around until they appear to be swimming. I’m not sure I really see the purpose of NaNo, if you’re going to write, then write. Being consistent is always a virtue, but cramming that much writing into a month seems like a waste of energy when you see the finished product and realise how much you have to revise. I suppose if your method works, however, then the time needed for ideas to breathe comes beforehand, and November is just the time where you start hammering the nails into the frame that’s already there.

    Good luck to you, at any rate. It’s a might undertaking, from any perspective.

    1. I’d never claim NaNo is for everyone, but it works for me. For one thing, it’s what got me into writing fiction when I’d convinced myself I wasn’t qualified. Now, I write year-round, but I always have several projects going at once, so I’m pretty scattered. NaNo is my one time of the year to drop everything else and focus on writing a complete novel without all the delays and procrastination that’s usually my style. But my point is that because of the way I work now, I don’t usually have a whole lot of revision to deal with. Your analogy is a good one, as far as it goes — that I’ve created the framework ahead of time. After hammering in the nails, I’m creating the picture on the canvas.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s